Remember last weekend when the monsoons hit? This Sunday, while waiting for my allergy pill to kick in so I could enjoy the beautiful day, I was reading Dominique Brownings critique of House Thinking by Winifred Gallagher. Though Dallas is not mentioned by name, Ms. Browning takes some Texas-sized jabs at Dallas home du jour, the McMansion:
Underlying every discussion is a definite, if unstated, prejudice in favor of a certain kind of architecture and lifestyle. Why are so many suburbs filled with McMansions? Gallagher argues that their designers and owners haven’t engaged in proper house thinking. If they had, they would understand that by her standards, their great rooms can be overwhelming, their front halls intimidating and wasteful, their kitchens nothing but showcases for takeout. And yet people build these houses, live in them, and love them. Why?
“It would have been interesting to explore the McMansion problem, the design world’s correlative to the obesity epidemic. Is there something about a need for status that’s overshadowing a need for coziness? Is there a great insecurity about new money that leads to these enormous facades? Is it braggadocio or simply confidence that’s expressed in the McMansions size? Are we building mighty fortresses? Is the divorce rate falling because people can live separate lives in the same house, phoning from one wing to the other to negotiate bedroom visitation?
I think shes got a point. Not just in Dallas, I have to say, but everywhere big homes to house three people are being born even in that most conservative bastion of my birthplace, suburban Chicago. (Id say it appears big houses are a trademark of Republicans but Fred Barons house blows that theory.) Couple this reading with the cover of Time Magazine on global warming and the melting of the polar ice caps, and it almost makes me want me to tear down my McMansion and built a subterranean home to guard against global warming an extra four degrees in August means what, 112 degrees every July?
Okay, subterranean is good for global warming — but last Sunday a subterranean house might well have become an aquarium. Almost everyone I knew was pumping water on Sunday and Monday we were fine, but our pool is only looking presentable today after we dumped buckets of chlorine into her. And how great is chlorine for the environment? So we who cleaned our pools this week all contributed to global warming. Its a vicious circle.
And very depressing. When I read stories like this, my brain always jumps ahead to an exaggerated conclusion: We werent meant to live in homes at all, really. Probably, the best thing for the environment would not be small cottages or ranches with Bauhaus ceilings but no cottage at all! Tree houses and igloos and homes made of mud adobe now were talking eco-friendly! The Eskimos used to call cold nights 60 degrees below zero a three dog night because thats how many dogs it took to warm their bed. Now we buy our Tinkerbelle-sized pets electric blankets.
The good news is we have about 90 years to do something to stop the Polar Ice Cap from melting. Maybe all those smart scientists can figure out a way to stuff the cracks with recycled Styrofoam cups or something. Meantime, my allergy meds have kicked in, and Im going out to clean the pool, which might not make a bad subterranean in a pinch!